Size Zero

81

By joeblogs

Size Zero - Disappearing into Nothingness?

Lately body image has undergone a change. It seems the world has finally realised that the starving orphan look it has long admired in runway models is unhealthy and downright unattractive.

This all began at the collapse of Luisel Ramos, during the 2006 Uruguay fashion week. She had been on a diet of lettuce leaves and diet coke for three months prior to the show, and died in hospital of heart failure, on the 2nd August, aged 22.

In the aftermath, Madrid Fashion week banned models who's BMI was below 18. Consequently 30% of applicants were turned away. Later the same year, all Italian fashion designers banned size zero models from the catwalks of Milan Fashion Week.

Slowly other countries followed suit. In 2007 a size zero model, Charlotte Carter was banned from London Fashion Week, and advised to gain a stone if she wanted to work, and in Spain, shop mannequins were increased to size 10.

2008 saw French MPs, advertisers, and fashion industries sign a charter promoting healthy body image, and illegitimating the promotion of excessive thinness, with a fine of up to 30,000 euros if disregarded.

In 2009, Germany's most popular fashion magazine, Brigitte , banned professional models in favour of women with 'realistic' figures. The editor, Andreas Lebert, claimed he was 'sick of fattening girls up' with photoshop.

This realisation that women can not connect with the unrealistic role-models the media presents them with couldn't have come too soon. 'Today's models weigh around 23% less than normal women' says Lebert, 'the whole model industry is anorexic.'

Also in 2009, Glamour magazine published a photograph of Lizzie Miller, a beautiful 'plus size' model. As a result of the overwhealming positive feedback from readers, Glamour commited to publishing more photos of 'normal' women. The enthusiasm of readers for this picture of a body that resembles their own, yet is still considered to be attractive, shows that women do not buy magazines to feel inferior and unattractive, or to be convinced that happiness is found in lettuce leaves and diet coke. Women want to see real attainable beauty - a goal they can aim for, while still working, going out, and cooking for their families, not a woman who's life is (literally) controlled by being thin. Who would want such a narrow life? Self confidence and an interesting personality (and conversation that isn't always about what you weigh) makes you so much more attractive than a few lost pounds.

In England an official ban on size zero models still has not been enforced, but a look at the pictures for London Fashion Week next month shows the principle has not gone unheeded. The models, whilst slim, look healthier and more attractive than their predecessors, and provide a far better frame for showcasing the pieces.

I really hope that this change in the media's attitude helps the nationwide low self esteem of women. 'I'll be happy when I'm thin', 'I'll be able to wear nice clothes after my next diet', 'I decided to join the gym after seeing myself in the mirror' are such common phrases from women, they seem a part of normal conversation. Sadly they reveal the incredibly low self worth of so many. Why do you need to be smaller to be happy? (unless medically, your size is affecting your health), why can't you buy nice clothes to fit you now? And why, when catching a glimpse of yourself in the mirror do you not notice what beauty is there, rather than focussing on what you want to change?

Disclaimer...This blog is not encouraging or excusing obesity, discouraging healthy weight loss, or criticizing naturally thin people, it is to encourage acceptance your own shape, right now. Even if medically, weight needs to be lost, a stressed and depressed attitude, driven by images of impossibly thin women will not make you healthier, nor will frantic self hatred make the weight loss any faster, just more painful. So please, look in the mirror and enjoy what you see, right now.

:)

Beautiful Bones?

Luisel Ramos - died of heart failure due to anorexia (see below)
Luisel Ramos - died of heart failure due to anorexia (see below)
She died aged 22 on the way to dressing rooms, having followed a diet of lettuce and diet coke for three months.
She died aged 22 on the way to dressing rooms, having followed a diet of lettuce and diet coke for three months.
Ana Carolina Reston - died age 21, weighing 40kg at 5'8", after following a diet of just tomatoes and apples
See all 10 photos
Ana Carolina Reston - died age 21, weighing 40kg at 5'8", after following a diet of just tomatoes and apples
Hila Elmalich - died in the hospital 34, weighing 60 pounds. She was there due to kidney failure caused by malnutrition
Hila Elmalich - died in the hospital 34, weighing 60 pounds. She was there due to kidney failure caused by malnutrition
Isabelle Caro - posed naked to raise awareness of eating disorders (see below)
Isabelle Caro - posed naked to raise awareness of eating disorders (see below)
This advert was introduced as Milan Fashion Week began.
This advert was introduced as Milan Fashion Week began.
London Fashion Week 2010 - Giles collection  - a healthier rolemodel
London Fashion Week 2010 - Giles collection - a healthier rolemodel
London Fashion Week 2010 - Giles collection
London Fashion Week 2010 - Giles collection
London Fashion Week 2010 - Erin O'Connor models Issa London collection
London Fashion Week 2010 - Erin O'Connor models Issa London collection
Milan Fashion Week 2006 - Valentina Mezzetti models Elena Miro's collection. Miro uses only models who are size 14 or 16, the average for a woman
Milan Fashion Week 2006 - Valentina Mezzetti models Elena Miro's collection. Miro uses only models who are size 14 or 16, the average for a woman
Lizzie Miller - 5 foot 11, 12.5 stone, size 14 (American size 12)
Lizzie Miller - 5 foot 11, 12.5 stone, size 14 (American size 12)

Comments

yo-blogs 21 months ago

I point out that all the "size zero" pictures with the exception of the ones used in the Isabelle Caro campaign have been photoshopped ...

And it's possible to be a healthy size 6 (American size 2, one more than the "size zero", which really should be a size 4 because we live in the UK) ...

Crash dieting - ie living off lettuce and diet coke - isn't the same as losing weight by eating less and exercising more. If you wanted to be very thin (or just thinner) you wouldn't necessarily have to adopt an anorexic mindset that risks death

And the average size 16 (UK) is medically overweight ...

And if you are slightly underweight you are more likely to live longer and in better health than if you were slightly overweight (look it up bbz)

And on average 1 in 4 people in the UK are obese, but this isn't any healthier because it's "average"

why aspire to something average when the average person is an idiot.

joeblogs profile image

joeblogs Hub Author 21 months ago

Hiii Charlotte

I didn't realise you were one of those experts on photoshopped photos

And if you carefully read my disclaimer (put in especially for you) 'This blog is not encouraging or excusing obesity, discouraging healthy weight loss, or criticizing naturally thin people' - I wasn't discouraging losing weight by eating less and exercising more.

Being medically overweight depends on height too bbz.

I didn't contest the slightly under/overweight health statistics (which oppose your argument anyway - http://www.diet-blog.com/08/underweight_or_slightl )

why admire people who starve themselves, when starving yourself is idiotic :)

yo-blogs 21 months ago

haha my - obv all safe and healthy - old facination with the pro-ana sites has generally put these images (quite famous in the pro-ana world, btw) into the "photoshopped" categories of their thinspo. Also I'm sure I've seen the original images. Which aren't that scary.

also the less you eat, the more important it is to eat "properly" (eat your vegetables blah blah)

sooo there is a difference between being malnourished and restricting calorie intake

http://www.longevitymeme.org/topics/calorie_restri

but i do concede your point. slightly maybe.

joeblogs profile image

joeblogs Hub Author 21 months ago

bbz that's calorie restriction, it doesn't advocate being underweight...

and regardless of the inauthenticity of the photographs (which I would like to see proof of) the models definitely died. So them being thin definitely wasn't a good idea...

yo-blog 21 months ago

type "luisel ramos photoshop" into google images and see

they didnt necessarily die from being at that weight, they died from massive undereating for prolonged periods of time

aaand like I was saying, you don't need to starve to loose weight, or maintain that weight. if you eat less (but still enough) etc etc it'll take longer, but its still possible

joeblogs profile image

joeblogs Hub Author 21 months ago

Aw wow my own blog comes up when I type that in :D

I couldn't find any sites that showed those pictures to be photoshopped. Clearly I don't have your dedication to the pro ana world...

I know what you're saying about 'healthy' weight loss, but when it reaches the stage that you are dangerously underweight, it matters less how you got there more that you are there and your body is unhealthy, organs cannot function etc etc. I remember you telling me in english when we were doing those size 0 essays that when you don't eat enough your body starts using muscle for fuel. And then organ tissue. If you don't eat enough, even if it is gradual weight loss, eventually you will suffer organ failure (see above).

jo-blogs 21 months ago

http://www.google.co.uk/images?um=1&hl=en&rlz=1B3G

duuuude im looking at it right now

11th picture in

joeblogs profile image

joeblogs Hub Author 21 months ago

if you click on the picture, it turns out merely to be [Platinum BITCH] 's opinion...

yo-blogs 21 months ago

its a photograph!! nothing to do with what the she thinks

PROOF i say.

joeblogs profile image

joeblogs Hub Author 21 months ago

ah ok, when I clicked it it went to myspace where [Platinum BITCH] is insisting that it is indeed photoshopped. On further inspecting the picture I see that you are right. Luisel, however, still died of anorexia, so the fact that the photo was photoshopped is merely a SMALL victory for you and your kind...

HappyHealthyEtc profile image

HappyHealthyEtc 21 months ago

I loved the article and I think the writer has a great point. Thanks for sharing your opinion with us. There's nothing better than being naturally healthy keeping a balanced diet in place and looking great without starving to death.

www.happy-healthy-successful.com

Supercellbaebe profile image

Supercellbaebe 15 months ago

Being even slightly underweight can shorten a persons life span by 10-15 years. It also increases the chances of developing osteoporosis.

In terms of weight and health it is actually healthier to be slightly over weight than slightly underweight.

Humans are naturally evolving to become shorter and rounder, its how the future of human kind has said to be going in terms of natural selection. So shorter and rounder MUST be healthier than taller and thinner.

Personally I think people, should be accepted, no matter what their weight, height or dress size is, naturally. What I have a problem with, is when people feel the need to fight against nature and starve themselves to maintain a body which isn't healthy for them. I wish everyone could accept and be accepted for who and what they are naturally.

xxx

joeblogs profile image

joeblogs Hub Author 15 months ago

While I agree that being slightly overweight is less harmful than slightly under, I do have to point out that generations are becoming taller and taller, and increasing roundness is possibly more to do with the evolution of the fast food industry than any Darwinist 'survival of the fittest'.

Most people I know, including myself, are pretty tall and thin, and I am unconvinced (and loath to think) that this body shape is less healthy.

I must also point out that this hub is not encouraging being 'rounder' over and above taller and thinner, just attempting to highlight the silliness of deliberate starvation.

Supercellbaebe profile image

Supercellbaebe 15 months ago

I did see it on a TV program that did some kind of a test to find out the course of human evolution over the next few generations. This is where I found out that shorter and rounder people are being selected naturally thorough evolution.

The program was called "Horizon, Are We Still Evolving?"

Check it out! Its really interesting and can be found on BBC i player xxx

crystolite profile image

crystolite 15 months ago

I don't really agree with you that those skinny thing you called beautiful bones is what it is,actually i see it as malnutrition or some kind of disease.

joeblogs profile image

joeblogs Hub Author 15 months ago

The question mark indicates that the statement is challenging the notion that extreme thinness is beautiful, as does the rest of the article (if you had read it).

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working